‘Independent state?’ Proposed referendum question approved on Alberta separation

EDMONTON — Alberta’s election agency announced Monday it has approved a proposed referendum question on the province separating from Canada.

The question seeks a yes or no answer to: “Do you agree that the province of Alberta should cease to be a part of Canada to become an independent state?”

Elections Alberta said the proponents — the Alberta Prosperity Project and its chief executive officer, Mitch Sylvestre — have until early January to appoint a financial officer for its petition campaign, after which signature collection can begin.

Sylvestre, a constituency association president for Premier Danielle Smith’s United Conservative Party, has four months to collect just under 178,000 signatures. If he does so, the question would be put to Albertans in a referendum.

The Alberta Prosperity Project said on social media Monday that the approval is a “huge victory” for the province.

“This is the breakthrough we’ve been fighting for,” it said.

Sylvestre, in an interview, said he thought Alberta needs to go it alone because of Ottawa’s restrictions on oil production and dim prospects for federal electoral change.

“This last election when the Liberals won after 10 years of absolute brutal government, as far as I was concerned, I believe that there’s absolutely no way that we’ll ever win another election in Alberta,” he said.

“It’s up to us to decide what to do about that.”

Sylvestre said the group already has 2,000 people signed up internally to collect signatures, and more than 240,000 people who have previously pledged their willingness to sign.

“This is very non-partisan as far as I’m concerned,” he said.

“Every Albertan will benefit from this, and it’ll give Alberta children and my grandchildren and my kids a much brighter future as far as I’m concerned, or I wouldn’t be doing it.”

The group’s approved question is similar to one it had previously submitted: “Do you agree that the province of Alberta shall become a sovereign country and cease to be a province in Canada?”

That question was held up in court for a review of its constitutionality.

The delay prompted Smith’s government to change the rules for citizen-initiated referendums earlier this month.

The changes rendered the court review moot, as it allowed Sylvestre to reapply at no charge while also preventing Alberta’s chief electoral officer from rejecting referendum proposals should they be unconstitutional or not factually accurate.

Justice Colin Feasby, who issued his decision on the original question despite the government vetoing the result, deemed the proposal to be unconstitutional, but only under the previous rules.

Feasby, in his decision, wrote that Alberta separating from Canada would violate certain Charter and treaty rights, as there are no guarantees Albertans would keep their right to vote federally or maintain mobility rights if the province were to become its own nation.

He also noted that those rights would need to be accounted for in any negotiation undertaken to amend the Constitution, something that would be required should Alberta actually look to quit confederation.

“Alberta chose not to give citizens the power to propose to take away Charter and Treaty rights through the citizen initiative process,” Feasby wrote.

But he added: “Alberta seems to regret this decision now.”

Justice Minister Mickey Amery’s press secretary, Heather Jenkins, said in an email that it’s a democratic right for people to participate in citizen initiated referendums and bring forward questions they deem important.

“If those seeking independence believe that they have the support for it, this is their chance to prove it,” she said.

Sylvestre said he was excited at the prospect that Albertans could soon decide their own fate.

“In spite of the fact that this has been a roller-coaster up and down ride, I think it’s going to be well worth it no matter what happens,” he said.

“The people are going to be able to decide based on the information that they get what they want to do with their future, and I think this is what democracy should be all about.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Dec. 22, 2025.

— With files from Dayne Patterson in Calgary.

Jack Farrell, The Canadian Press